#8gb or 16gb ram macbook pro pro

according to Apple) these models only support 8GB of RAM. This model has two memory slots capable of taking 204-pin PC3-12800 (1600 MHz) DDR3 SO-DIMM memory chips.

#8gb or 16gb ram macbook pro pro

However: I don’t trust the videos that show the base model running with 100+ tracks of loops, basically dropped in as a stress test, along w/fx to be an accurate representation of how many tracks can be loaded, both audio/vi, with a low enough buffer to play another instrument or record audio with no issues.Your question doesn't specify which model of MacBook Pro (Mid 2012) you're asking about and the answer may be different depending on model. If my estimate is too conservative, it's cool by me. But for *many, many* users 8Gb in an M1 machine will be entirely adequate. It's true that everyone's use case is different, and for certain instances 16Gb would be a requirement. That's no longer (necessarily) a requirement for an M1 machine because of its architecture and efficient paging. We've been conditioned for years to load up our machines with huge amounts of RAM. The M1's 'system on a chip' architecture simply cannot be compared to older architectural paradigms. There are some woefully misinformed and outdated responses in this thread. Seriously? 8-12 tracks on M1 mini? Heck, I can do 20+ tracks easily on my 2012 quad core mini. Nice to have, but I already committed myself. I expect the M1max or Pro chips would be overkill for me.

of BTOs, best to be safe than sorry, so I chose 16gb. It's been a general rule of thumb for decades that the more RAM the better, and with Apple,s new M.O. When it was all Native Logic, it flew, and I could envisage completing projects of maybe 8-12 audio trx and 2-4 VIs without issue, as long as Logic's instruments and fx were used. I tested my wife's basic M1 mini around a year ago, and it handled Logic with 3rd party plugins well enough. I don't see why anyone would have multiple apps open during a Logic recording session. (You can even freeze your 'star.') The sound file will come out the same. Your computer can do a great many things, but it doesn't actually have to do all of them at the same time. Why ask your CPU(s) to waste their time doing the same now-inconsequential thing over and over again?įor example – if 'the star of your show' needs the benefit of a CPU-soaker plugin, 'what about those background singers?' Freeze 'em to make room. Once you've finished working on them (for now.

Many projects consist of several parallel sections that don't really involve each other, and which you focus-on one at a time. Such that the only way that you can solve the problem is by breaking it down: by planning-ahead on your project in stages so that you do certain things 'not 'in real time.'' 'Freeze,' 'Bounce in Place,' and other features actually work quite well: Logic's designers obviously realized the importance of this, so they addressed the need quite admirably. Now, having said that: eventually you will run up against some limit of your hardware, no matter how 'phat' it is. This is why, of the various other factors, RAM-size is always most important: the computer can't make information available if there is no place to put it, and 'virtual memory' in this case is not the same. (Otherwise: 'system overload.') It doesn't matter how many CPU(s) it has to work on the data, if the data is not there. Remember: 'RAM is the only thing in your computer that is just as fast as your CPU(s).' And: 'your CPU(s) can do nothing without it.'Īs a so-called 'real-time application,' Logic, when used in real-time mode, must be able to get whatever-it-needs into RAM before it is needed. I'd say the most significant thing about a MacBook isn't what it can't achieve, but what it can. But I reckon I could just about make it work if I used Freeze on tracks, so they weren't running the plug-ins in real-time. Would I choose a MacBook Pro to handle a plug-in heavy 32+ track mix? Er. They certainly didn't want catch a flight to assemble in one studio for a mass sing-a-thon! The song was a big hit. That was because a lot of singers were prepared to take part, as long as the project came to them. I remember a charity single, more than 20 years ago, where most of the vocal tracks were recorded on a MacBook.

It depends what you're trying to achieve, and your budget. However, I completely agree with that RAM is king when it comes to the number of real-time processes a machine can handle.

If you want to run LPX on a laptop, the MacBook Pro is really the only machine to buy. What it 'looks like' is not really the point, with respect. Can a computer-like thing, what looks like reminiscent of a monolithic thin client, used in client-server systems, considered studio-ready at all? Maybe it need a application server?